>> 自然科学版 >> 当期目录 >> 正文
低阶煤不同宏观煤岩组分孔隙发育特征及甲烷吸附/解吸性能 差异
供稿: 李卫波,李菲,史利燕,周少伟,马东民,王传涛,陈跃 时间: 2024-03-25 次数:

李卫波,李菲,史利燕,等.低阶煤不同宏观煤岩组分孔隙发育特征及甲烷吸附/解吸性能差异[J.河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2024432):57-67.

LI W BLI FSHI L Yet al.Differences in the pore characteristics and adsorption/desorption of coalbed methane of different coal macrolithotype in low-rank coal reservoirsJ.Journal of Henan Polytechnic UniversityNatural Science),2024432):57-67.

低阶煤不同宏观煤岩组分孔隙发育特征及甲烷吸附/解吸性能

差异

李卫波1,李菲1,史利燕1,周少伟1,马东民2,王传涛3,陈跃2

1.陕西省地质科技中心,陕西 西安 7100542.西安科技大学 地质与环境学院,陕西 西安 7100543.延安大学 化学与化工学院,陕西 延安 716000

摘要:  目的 针对煤储层非均质性较强,不同宏观煤岩组分由于物质成分和孔隙结构差异导致煤层气吸附解吸性能和气水运移特征迥异的问题,方法 以以黄陇煤田彬长矿区延安组低阶煤为研究对象,采集并分离镜煤和暗煤组分,综合运用显微组分测定、元素分析、压汞、低温液氮吸附、吸附解吸试验等测试方法,研究低阶镜煤和暗煤的孔隙发育特征差异和对甲烷吸附/解吸性能的影响。。结果 结果表明:(1)镜煤的镜质组质量分数、挥发分及HONS元素质量分数高于暗煤的,而惰质组、壳质组、矿物、灰分、固定碳和C元素质量分数低于暗煤的。(2)煤样孔隙度为2.92%~10.29%,总体孔隙较发育,暗煤孔隙度略高于镜煤的,孔喉更粗,大孔更发育,连通性更好。镜煤BET比表面积和BJH总孔容均略大于暗煤的,微孔更发育,且多以半封闭型和墨水瓶型孔隙为主。(3)镜煤微小孔更发育,比表面积更大,吸附能力更强。结论 煤中甲烷吸附/解吸过程普遍存在解吸滞后现象,暗煤孔隙连通性相对较好,解吸滞后程度低于镜煤的,理论解吸效率高于镜煤的。研究结果可为彬长矿区低阶煤煤层气储层物性认识提供参考。

关键词: 黄陇煤田;低煤阶;煤岩组分;孔隙结构;吸附解吸

doi:10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2021110078

基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41902175);陕西省地勘基金公益性项目(2019JQ-245

收稿日期: 2022/11/19

修回日期: 2022/12/14

出版日期:2024/03/25

Differences in the pore characteristics and adsorption/desorption of coalbed methane of different coal macrolithotype in low-rank coal reservoirs

LI Weibo1LI Fei1SHI Liyan1ZHOU Shaowei1MA Dongmin2WANG Chuantao3CHEN Yue2

1.Shaanxi Geological Science and Technology CenterXian 710054ShaanxiChina2.College of Geology and EnvironmentXian University of Science and TechnologyXian 710054ShaanxiChina3.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringYanan UniversityYanan 716000ShaanxiChina

Abstract: Objectives The heterogeneity of coal reservoirs is strongand the differences in material composition and pore structure among different macrolithotypes lead to significant differences in the adsorption and desorption performance of coalbed methane and the characteristics of gas-water migration. Methods Taking the Yanan Formation low rank coal in the Binchang mining area of Huanglong Coalfield as the research objectthe components of vitrinite and dark coal were collected and separated.Comprehensive testing methods such as microscopic component determinationelemental analysismercury intrusionlow-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorptionand adsorption desorption experiments were used to study the differences in porosity development characteristics of low rank vitrinite and dark coal and their impact on methane adsorption/desorption performance. Results The results showed,(1The mass fraction of vitrinitevolatile matter and HON and S elements of vitrain were higher than those of durainwhile the mass fractions of inertinitechitinitemineralsashfixed carbon and C elements were lower than those of durain;(2The porosity of the coal sample was 2.92%~10.29%and the overall pores were relatively developed.The porosity of durain was slightly higher than that of vitrain.The porosity of durain was slightly higher than that of vitrinitewith thicker pore throatsmore developed macroporesand better connectivity.The BET specific surface area and BJH total pore volume of vitrain coal were slightly larger than durainand the micropores were more developedmainly consisting of semi-closed and ink bottle shaped pores;(3Mirror coal had more developed micro poreslarger specific surface areaand stronger adsorption capacity. Conclusions The methane adsorption/desorption process in coal generally exhibits desorption hysteresiswith relatively good pore connectivity in dark coal.The degree of desorption hysteresis was lower than that of vitriniteand the theoretical desorption efficiency was higher than that of vitrinite.The research results can provide reference for understanding the physical properties of low rank coalbed methane reservoirs in Binchang mining area.

Key words:Huanglong Coalfieldlow coal-rankcoal lithotypepore structureadsorption/desorption

 

 

最近更新