>> 自然科学版期刊 >> 2021 >> 2021年04期 >> 正文
贵阳不同母岩风化红黏土物理力学性质差异研究
时间: 2021-07-10 次数:

谢延江, 王中美, 孙乾征,.贵阳不同母岩风化红黏土物理力学性质差异研究[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2021,40(4):98-106.

XIE Y J, WANG Z M, SUN Q Z, et al.Study on physical and mechanical properties differences of weatheredred clay from different parent rocks in Guiyang[J].Journal of Henan Polytechnic University(Natural Science) ,2021,40(4):98-106.

贵阳不同母岩风化红黏土物理力学性质差异研究

谢延江, 王中美, 孙乾征, 杨洲, 付海

贵州大学 资源与环境工程学院,贵州 贵阳550025

摘要:为查明贵阳不同碳酸盐母岩风化红黏土物理力学性质差异原因,取贵阳市不同碳酸盐母岩风化的原状红黏土样品6份,进行固结不排水剪(CU)、无侧限抗压强度(QU)、固结压缩、X 射线衍射(XRD)、X射线荧光光谱(XRF)、电子扫描显微镜(SEM)、能谱扫描(EDS)、颗粒分析等试验研究。结果表明:两种红黏土(粒径大于250 ^m)的体积分数具有明显差异,且灰岩风化红黏土中含有铁橄榄石,不含绿泥石,白云岩风化红黏土与之相反;两种红黏土的微观结构、排列方式和孔隙类型具有明显差异;物理性质指标除相对体积质量外,其余指标都是灰岩风化红黏土的大于白云岩风化红黏土的;灰岩风化红黏土的压缩性小于白云岩风化红黏土的,但灰岩风化红黏土的抗剪强度和抗压强度都大于白云岩风化红黏土的,尤其在含水率35% 55%时最为明显。研究结果可为今后红黏土的改性加固研究及工程建设提供依据和指导。

关键词:贵阳红黏土;物质组成;微观结构;物理性质;力学性质;差异

doi:10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2020030036

基金项目:贵州省科学技术厅社会发展科技攻关项目(黔科合支撑[20172866);贵州省科技计划联合基金资助项目(黔科合LH 2017 7284号);贵州省科学技术厅科技平台及人才团队计划项目(黔科合平台人才〔20175402号)

收稿日期:2020/03/11

修回日期:2020/04/13

出版日期:2021/07/15

Study on physical and mechanical properties differences of weatheredred clay from different parent rocks in Guiyang

XIE Yanjiang, WANG Zhongmei, SUN Qianzheng, YANG Zhou, FU Hai

College of Resources and Environmental Engineering Guizhou University Guiyang 550025 Guizhou China

Abstract:In order to find out the physical and mechanical properties of weathered red clay from different carbonate parent rocks in Guiyang six undisturbed red clay samples with different parent rock weathering were taken and tested to conduct the study including consolidation undrained shear CU unconfined compressive strength QU consolidation compression X-ray diffraction XRD X-ray fluorescence spectrum XRF electron scanning microscope SEM energy spectrum scanning EDS and particle analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the volume fraction of the two kinds of red clay whose particle size was more than 250 jxm and the weathered red clay of limestone contained ferroolivine and did not contain chlorite while the weathered red clay of dolomite was on the contrary There were obvious differences in microstructure arrangement and pore type between the two red clays The other physical indicators of limestone weathered red clay were larger than dolomite weathered red clay except the specific gravity The compressibility of limestone weathered red clay was lower than that of dolomite weathered red clay but the shear strength and compressive strength of limestone weathered red clay were higher than that of dolomite weathered red clay especially when the water content was 35% and 55% . The research results could provide basis and guidance for the research of modification and reinforcement of red clay and the engineering construction in the future.

Key words:Guiyang red clay;material composition;microstructure;physical property;mechanical property;difference

 贵阳不同母岩风化红黏土物理力学性质差异研究_谢延江.pdf

最近更新