>> English >> Online First >> 正文
Landslide susceptibility assessment Based on machine learning and encoders
Time: 2024-07-28 Counts:

ZHANG M MLI S DWANG Xet al.Landslide susceptibility assessment Based on machine learning and encoders[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University( Natural Science), doi: 10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2023120035.  

Received2023-12-12

Revised2024-04-09

Online2024-07-28

Landslide susceptibility assessment Based on machine learning and encoders (Online)

ZHANG Mengmeng1LI Shaoda1WANG Xiao2LI Xinyue3DAI Keren14

1. School of Earth and Planetary ScienceChengdu University of TechnologyChengdu 610059SichuanChina2.School of Architecture and Civil EngineeringChengdu UniversityChengdu 610106SichuanChina3.Mahindra United World College of IndiaPuneMH 412108India4.State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment ProtectionChengdu University of TechnologyChengdu 610059SichuanChina

Abstract: Objectives To enhance the ability of machine learning models to extract data features with limited samples and improve the predictive accuracy of the models. Methods In this paperJiulong CountyKangding CityLuding County and Muli Countythe key provincial erosion prevention areas in the middle and lower reaches of the Yalong and Dadu Rivers in Sichuan Provincewere selected as the study area for landslide susceptibility evaluationtwelve influencing factors were selected to construct the landslide susceptibility evaluation index systemthe coefficient of determinationCFwas used to quantify the evaluation indexand noise-reducing auto-encodersDAEs and convolutional auto-encodersCAE were added to the best-performing model by comparing the logistic regressionLRand the support vector machineSVM models. Results By comparing with the CF-LR modelthe CF-SVM model showed improvements of 31.9% in precisionP),1.1% in F-measure17.1% in Kappa coefficient8.5% in overall accuracyOA),and 8.6% in AUC. The addition of the DAE encoder to CF-SVM increased recallR by 8.1%F-measure by 5.8%Kappa coefficient by 8.1%and overall accuracyOAby 4% compared to the original CF-SVM. The addition of the CAE encoder to CF-SVM increased recallRby 0.4%F-measure by 0.2%Kappa coefficient by 0.2%and overall accuracyOAby 0.1% compared to the original CF-SVM. Conclusions The CF-SVM

model has higher prediction accuracy among the selected machine learning methods. The DAE encoder added to the CF-SVM has better robustness compared to CAE encoderthus the CF-SVM-DAE model performs the best among all models and is more suitable for the current study area.

Key wordsLandslidessusceptibility modellingLRSVMencoders

CLC: P642.22  

 

 

Lastest