供稿: 侯玉贵 | 时间: 2019-04-19 | 次数: |
作者:侯玉贵
作者单位:曲阜师范大学文学院
摘要:对于《金瓶梅词话》中的词语,前人已做了大量考释,取得了丰硕的成果,但部分词语的内在理据及解释论证仍不准确、不充分。文章就前人释而不确、不备者,运用同时期其他山东方言文献资料、现代方言材料和书中内证,对书中"吊"等三个释义不确的词语,进行了辨证考源;对书中"隔二骗三"等三个释义不确切的词语,进行了补证考源。
基金:曲阜师范大学2018年研究生学位论文科研创新资助基金项目(30);
DOI:10.16698/j.hpu(social.sciences).1673-9779.2019.02.016
分类号:I207.419;H134
Abstract:For the words in Jin Ping Mei Ci Hua, scholars have done a lot of textual research and interpretations, and achieved fruitful results, but the internal motivation and interpretations of some words are still inaccurate and inadequate. Using other Shandong dialect documents, modern dialect materials and the internal evidence in the book, this paper makes dialectical textual research on the source of three words which have not been interpreted accurately, such as“Diao” ( 吊) in the book, and makes supplementary textual research on three words which have not been interpreted clearly, such as “Ge er pian