认罪认罚简易程序中的量刑辩护(点击标题下载全文) 已下载

作者:刘妍

作者单位:郑州大学法学院

摘要:2018年新《刑诉法》修订确立了认罪认罚制度。认罪认罚协议存在两种司法审查程序,简易程序为其中之一。由于该类案件的特殊性,简易程序本身的特性被弱化,庭审阶段的量刑辩护遭到忽视,其中存在的问题也缺乏充分讨论。从理论上而言,认罪认罚简易程序的量刑辩护是否具有存在并实质进行的合理性,被告人是否自主进行量刑辩护,公平审判价值是否要求辩护人参与等问题需要分析和辨明。从司法实践上而言,适用认罪认罚简易程序的案件中确实存在量刑辩护,并且量刑辩护在一定程度上能够对审判产生影响,但该辩护在实然上并不充分,并且缺乏内在动力。所以,需要对认罪认罚简易程序中的量刑辩护进行研究,并对现有司法制度提出相应完善措施。

关键词:认罪认罚;简易程序;量刑辩护;量刑情节;辩护主体;

DOI:10.16698/j.hpu(social.sciences).1673-9779.2019.04.003

分类号:D925.2

On the sentencing defense in the summary procedure of confession penalty

LIU Yan

School of Law, Zhengzhou University

Abstract:In 2018, the new Criminal Procedure Law was amended to establish a system of plea penalty, and there are two judicial review procedures for plea penalty agreements, one of which is summary procedure. However, due to the particularity of this kind of case, the characteristics of the summary procedure itself are weakened, the sentencing defense in the trial stage is neglected, and the problems existing in it are not fully discussed. Theoretically, whether the sentencing defense of penalty summary procedure has the rationality of existence and substance, whether the defendant can defend the sentence autonomously, and whether the value of fair trial requires the participation of the defender need to be analyzed and identified. As far as judicial practice is concerned, there is indeed a sentencing defense in the case of the application of the penalty summary procedure, and the sentencing defense can have an impact on the trial to a certain extent, but the defense is not sufficient in practice and lacks internal motivation. Therefore, it is necessary to study the sentencing defense in the summary procedure of guilty plea penalty, and put forward the corresponding measures for the existing judicial system.

 
 
Insert title here
Copyright ?2013. All Rights Reserved  河南理工大学出版中心 
 Tel:0391-3987068,3987069;E-mail:
zkxb@hpu.edu.cn,skxb@hpu.edu.cn
建议使用win7以上系统,和IE9及以上浏览器以获得更好的使用体验