供稿: 谢阳 | 时间: 2018-12-05 | 次数: |
作者:谢阳
作者单位:南京师范大学文学院
摘要:阎连科的作品涉及乡土小说、乡土散文两大领域,选择其代表作与鲁迅的类似文本进行比对,从而厘清阎连科对鲁迅精神的继承和发展。在乡土小说中,阎连科汲取鲁迅"离去——归来——再离去"的模式精华,揭示出知识分子在当下乡村的普遍"失根"之感。在乡土散文中,阎连科如鲁迅一般积极介入公共生活,执笔揭露当代乡村之痛,拷问时代之变。因此,虽然阎连科在乡土文学领域饱受争议,但是其文学世界之中凸显的诸多鲁迅精神因素,值得其他作家反思、警醒。
DOI:10.16698/j.hpu(social.sciences).1673-9779.2018.03.008
分类号:I206.7
Abstract:Yan Lianke's works involves two areas: the local novels and the local prose. Comparing his representative works with Lu Xun's similar works can clarify the writer's development of the Lu Xun spirit. In the field of local novels, Yan Lianke gets benefits from Lu Xun's “leave-return-leave-again”model, showing the local intellectuals' rootless feeling. In the field of local prose, following Lu Xun's attitude to public life, Yan Lianke reveals the problems in the rural area and the changes of the society.Therefore, though Yan Lianke has been controversial in the field of local literature, the Lu Xun spirit highlighted in his literary world is worth studying.