>> 社会科学版期刊 >> 2019 >> 2019年01期 >> 正文
张新之《妙复轩评石头记》抄本考论
供稿: 拜剑锋 时间: 2019-04-22 次数:

作者:拜剑锋

作者单位:中国矿业大学公共管理学院

摘要:国家图书馆(文津楼)藏存张新之《妙复轩评石头记》是一部未经比勘的手抄本。通过对抄本与晚清孙桐生整理过录的《妙复轩评本·绣像石头记红楼梦》前十六回的评语进行细致比对,发现孙桐生在过录张新之评点时对评语做了大量的增、删、错置,有严重的失真现象。通过对该现象的考证研究,有如下具体发现:关于抄本所用底本的发现;关于作者曹雪芹的发现;关于评点技法的梳理。这三方面的发现将有助于还原真实的张新之评点,可为后来学者的研究提供新的材料依据。

关键词:张新之;妙复轩评石头记;抄本;考论;

DOI:10.16698/j.hpu(social.sciences).1673-9779.2019.01.009

分类号:I207.411

Textual research on Zhang Xinzhi's Transcript of Miao Fuxuan's Comments on The Story of the Stone

BAI Jianfeng

School of Public Policy & Management, China University of Mining and Technology

Abstract:Zhang Xinzhi' s Transcript of Miao Fuxuan' s Comments on the Story of the Stone in the National Library (Wen Jin Lou) is a manuscript without proofreading. Through a detailed comparison between the transcript and the comments on the first sixteen chapters of Miao Fuxuan' s Comments on Embroidered Image of the Story of the Stone, which was recorded by Sun Tongsheng in the late Qing Dynasty, it was found that Sun Tongsheng made a great deal of increasing, deleting, and misplacing the comments by Zhang Xinzhi, and there was a serious distortion. There are three specific findings on this phenomenon: the discovery of the original version used in the transcript, the discovery of the author Cao Xueqin, and combing the evaluation techniques. These findings will help to restore the original comments by Zhang Xinzhi and provide a new material basis for future studies.

最近更新